Can you show us the MediaInfo so we can check? If it’s Hi10 then there is no device that can decode this via hardware acceleration.
Please do so in a separate thread so we don’t distract from the original issue at hand
Cheers
Sam
Can you show us the MediaInfo so we can check? If it’s Hi10 then there is no device that can decode this via hardware acceleration.
Please do so in a separate thread so we don’t distract from the original issue at hand
Cheers
Sam
FYI, im using the Vero 4K on a Cisco Catalyst 24 Port POE Gigabit Switch module inside a Cisco 3945 Router. I’ve no issues with speed/performance
That was with iperf server running on a Windows PC, and the client on the Vero 4K+ .
I’m not seeing any issues with video playback when using an Nvidia Shield TV (playing the same video file in Kodi Leia beta 2) so the the Vero is clearly having issues that other devices aren’t.
I will have a hunt around and see if I can find anything else I can run iperf on; what kind of numbers would you expect to get if everything is working okay?
How do I install perf3 on the OSMC ?
Anyway I also have a Vero 4K and that unit works well on the same switch. WIth the Vero 4K+ see issues when playing TV channels and all othe media.
sudo apt-get install iperf3
iperf3 looks fine to my Windows 10 PC.
Still in KODI the performance is absolute terrible.
.241 = OSMC2
.171 = WIN10
osmc@osmc:~$ iperf3 -R -c 172.19.3.171
Connecting to host 172.19.3.171, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 172.19.3.171 is sending
[  4] local 172.19.3.241 port 41210 connected to 172.19.3.171 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   111 MBytes   930 Mbits/sec
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec   111 MBytes   930 Mbits/sec
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec   111 MBytes   931 Mbits/sec
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec   111 MBytes   928 Mbits/sec
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec   110 MBytes   926 Mbits/sec
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec   111 MBytes   930 Mbits/sec
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec   111 MBytes   930 Mbits/sec
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec   111 MBytes   930 Mbits/sec
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec   111 MBytes   928 Mbits/sec
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec   111 MBytes   931 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.08 GBytes   929 Mbits/sec                  sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.08 GBytes   929 Mbits/sec                  receiver
iperf Done.
C:\iperf3>iperf3 -R -c 172.19.3.241
Connecting to host 172.19.3.241, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 172.19.3.241 is sending
[  4] local 172.19.3.171 port 57995 connected to 172.19.3.241 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  43.9 MBytes   368 Mbits/sec
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  45.7 MBytes   384 Mbits/sec
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  33.0 MBytes   277 Mbits/sec
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  43.3 MBytes   363 Mbits/sec
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  40.0 MBytes   335 Mbits/sec
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  37.3 MBytes   313 Mbits/sec
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  39.4 MBytes   330 Mbits/sec
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  22.9 MBytes   192 Mbits/sec
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  30.7 MBytes   258 Mbits/sec
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  33.1 MBytes   277 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   370 MBytes   311 Mbits/sec  106             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   369 MBytes   310 Mbits/sec                  receiver
iperf Done.
How does result of iperf3 -c 172.19.3.171 look like?
Also the >300Mbit result points to a different issue than what is seen in this thread. Did you try different cable/port?
Late edit: this post ended up being very long and rambling. See post 32 farther down for a summary.
I temporarily installed OSMC on my Rapsberry Pi 3+ and ran iperf3 on that. It’s connected to the same switch as the Vero 4K+. Here are the results:
    Connecting to host 192.168.1.13, port 5201
[  4] local 192.168.1.7 port 35624 connected to 192.168.1.13 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  41.6 MBytes   349 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  37.9 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  37.9 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  37.9 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  37.9 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  37.9 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  37.9 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  38.0 MBytes   319 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  37.9 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  37.9 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec    0    215 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   383 MBytes   321 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   379 MBytes   318 Mbits/sec                  receiver
iperf Done.
So, fairly solid, no obvious issues.
Here are the results for the Vero 4K+ this morning:
Connecting to host 192.168.1.13, port 5201
[  4] local 192.168.1.209 port 50940 connected to 192.168.1.13 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  5.99 MBytes  50.2 Mbits/sec   27   8.55 KBytes
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  3.52 MBytes  29.6 Mbits/sec   26   5.70 KBytes
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  3.15 MBytes  26.4 Mbits/sec   18   8.55 KBytes
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  4.85 MBytes  40.7 Mbits/sec   28   8.55 KBytes
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  6.54 MBytes  54.8 Mbits/sec   40   8.55 KBytes
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec   365 KBytes  2.99 Mbits/sec    8   2.85 KBytes
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec   733 KBytes  6.00 Mbits/sec   11   7.13 KBytes
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  3.28 MBytes  27.5 Mbits/sec   34   7.13 KBytes
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec   408 KBytes  3.34 Mbits/sec    3   8.55 KBytes
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  5.64 MBytes  47.3 Mbits/sec   32   7.13 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  34.4 MBytes  28.9 Mbits/sec  227             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  33.4 MBytes  28.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver
iperf Done.
Those don’t look like good numbers to me.
EDIT:
EDIT 2:
Just to confirm that the switch and the network as a whole are capable of running at Gigabit speeds, here’s the result of running iperf3 on my Nvidia Shield TV (also connected to the same switch):
EDIT 3:
I tried using a different local Ethernet switch (Linksys K341815): no measurable difference.
Also tried running a longer cable from the Vero 4K+ directly to the router: also, not much difference.
EDIT 4:
Ah, this is interesting. I tried downloading ethtool (sudo apt-get install ethtool) and using it force the ethernet to connect at 100Mb/s instead of 1Gb (sudo ethtool -s eth0 speed 100 duplex full autoneg on).
That gives greatly improved iperf3 results:
Connecting to host 192.168.1.13, port 5201
[  4] local 192.168.1.209 port 51004 connected to 192.168.1.13 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  15.2 MBytes   127 Mbits/sec    0    268 KBytes
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  94.2 Mbits/sec    0    269 KBytes
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.8 Mbits/sec    0    269 KBytes
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  94.0 Mbits/sec    0    271 KBytes
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  94.4 Mbits/sec    0    271 KBytes
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  96.0 Mbits/sec    0    271 KBytes
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  11.3 MBytes  95.0 Mbits/sec    0    271 KBytes
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  94.2 Mbits/sec    0    271 KBytes
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.5 Mbits/sec    0    271 KBytes
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  11.3 MBytes  95.0 Mbits/sec    0    271 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   117 MBytes  98.1 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   113 MBytes  95.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver
So, it seems to be stable at 100Mb/s, but the speed bounces all over the place at 1Gb/s. Given that it does this with two different switches, and when connected directly to the router, and that two other devices have no problems when connected to the same switch (and, in one case, using the same cable and the same and the same port on the switch) it seems pretty clear that there’s a problem with the Vero 4K+ .
Whether that’s a hardware or software problem, I wouldn’t like to say.
EDIT 5:
Just in case I wasn’t confused enough, I set it back to 1Gb/s using ethtool (sudo ethtool -s eth0 speed 1000 duplex full autoneg on) and now the iperf results are suddenly up in the 200-300 Mb/s range.
What the hell?! ![]()
Speed is still rather variable, though, and still only about 25-30% of what it should be hitting if it’s a genuine Gigabit ethernet device.
osmc@osmc:~$ iperf3 -c 172.19.3.171
Connecting to host 172.19.3.171, port 5201
[  4] local 172.19.3.241 port 41469 connected to 172.19.3.171 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  37.3 MBytes   313 Mbits/sec   13   21.4 KBytes
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  37.8 MBytes   317 Mbits/sec    8   31.4 KBytes
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  31.9 MBytes   268 Mbits/sec   13   24.2 KBytes
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  23.3 MBytes   195 Mbits/sec   18   15.7 KBytes
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  30.1 MBytes   253 Mbits/sec   10   35.6 KBytes
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  35.7 MBytes   300 Mbits/sec   10   32.8 KBytes
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  33.2 MBytes   278 Mbits/sec    9   32.8 KBytes
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  34.1 MBytes   286 Mbits/sec   13   22.8 KBytes
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  33.5 MBytes   281 Mbits/sec    8   37.1 KBytes
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  23.5 MBytes   197 Mbits/sec   15   31.4 KBytes
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   320 MBytes   269 Mbits/sec  117             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   320 MBytes   268 Mbits/sec                  receiver
Accepted connection from 172.19.3.241, port 41468
[  5] local 172.19.3.171 port 5201 connected to 172.19.3.241 port 41469
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  36.6 MBytes   307 Mbits/sec
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  37.6 MBytes   315 Mbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  31.8 MBytes   267 Mbits/sec
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  23.6 MBytes   198 Mbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  29.9 MBytes   251 Mbits/sec
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  35.5 MBytes   298 Mbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  33.2 MBytes   278 Mbits/sec
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  34.3 MBytes   288 Mbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  33.3 MBytes   279 Mbits/sec
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  23.6 MBytes   198 Mbits/sec
[  5]  10.00-10.02  sec   639 KBytes   314 Mbits/sec
Different results now
@sam_nazarko you’ve got me listed as having two devices, when I was just chatting with the guy with two.
I’ve just got the one. It doesn’t like ethernet. Happy to test anything, I’m competent to follow instructions.
Thanks for clarifying.
I have received the switch so I can test things now.
Sam
My last post in this thread turned into a weird sort of extended blog. 
 Here’s a (slightly) shorter version:
Based on iperf3 numbers, my 4K+ is reasonably stable if I force it to 100Mb/s, but numbers are all over the map at 1Gb/s.
I’ve tried three different network cables (two are short, good-quality, and rated Cat6a, the other a longer but solid Cat5a); I’ve also tried two different switches, and connecting directly to the router (a fairly decent one - Asus RT-AC86U). Same problems in all cases.
I’ve tested two other devices connected to the same switch - both achieve perfectly stable expected top speeds. One of them was tested with the same cable and the same switch port that the 4K+ was using.
So, I reckon my 4K+ has issues. Is there anything else you’d like me to test?
Hi Sam
Unfortunately my new Vero 4k+ is also failing to achieve anything near gigabit speeds. When testing with iperf3 I get a wide variety of speeds below 100 but nowhere near the 900’s. It is also of concern how variable the Vero speeds are whereas all other parts of my LAN are very consistent.
I have tested all the other parts of my LAN and they are all consistently getting around 945.
Any suggestions of what next? Thanks
Additonal info: running iperf -s from OSMC end gives gigabit speeds.  But shows 0 for sender in the summary at the bottom.
When I run iperf -s from the other end then I am lucky to get 34 Mbits.
osmc@192.168.0.131
Linux vero4k 3.14.29-117-osmc #1 SMP Mon Sep 3 00:16:47 UTC 2018 aarch64
osmc@vero4k:~$ iperf3 -c 192.168.0.136
Connecting to host 192.168.0.136, port 5201
[  4] local 192.168.0.131 port 40953 connected to 192.168.0.136 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  4.17 MBytes  34.9 Mbits/sec  135   4.24 KBytes
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  3.84 MBytes  32.2 Mbits/sec  142   2.83 KBytes
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  3.79 MBytes  31.8 Mbits/sec  158   4.24 KBytes
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  3.80 MBytes  31.8 Mbits/sec  154   4.24 KBytes
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.15 MBytes  9.65 Mbits/sec   55   2.83 KBytes
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  2.78 MBytes  23.3 Mbits/sec  108   4.24 KBytes
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.29 MBytes  10.8 Mbits/sec   61   4.24 KBytes
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  3.66 MBytes  30.7 Mbits/sec  171   4.24 KBytes
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.18 MBytes  9.86 Mbits/sec   50   2.83 KBytes
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  5.12 MBytes  43.0 Mbits/sec  184   2.83 KBytes
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  30.8 MBytes  25.8 Mbits/sec  1218             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  30.7 MBytes  25.7 Mbits/sec                  receiver
Accepted connection from 192.168.0.136, port 49184
[  5] local 192.168.0.131 port 5201 connected to 192.168.0.136 port 49186
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   110 MBytes   925 Mbits/sec
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   111 MBytes   934 Mbits/sec
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]  10.00-10.01  sec   631 KBytes   885 Mbits/sec
Accepted connection from 192.168.0.136, port 49188
[  5] local 192.168.0.131 port 5201 connected to 192.168.0.136 port 49190
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  82.1 MBytes   689 Mbits/sec
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   112 MBytes   940 Mbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   112 MBytes   938 Mbits/sec
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]  10.00-10.02  sec  2.52 MBytes   928 Mbits/sec
Accepted connection from 192.168.0.136, port 49192
[  5] local 192.168.0.131 port 5201 connected to 192.168.0.136 port 49194
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   109 MBytes   912 Mbits/sec
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec
[  5]  10.00-10.00  sec   223 KBytes   783 Mbits/sec
I did some testing with @martini2’s switch on a known good Vero 4K +. After initially connecting, I could only get 40Mbps TX. After changing the power supply he sent with the switch, I managed to get 900Mbps+.
I’ve made a number of changes will improve performance and address some corner cases and these will be available shortly in an update.
To test this update:
/etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://apt.osmc.tv stretch-devel main
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade && reboot
Please see if the issue is resolved.
I also recommend you edit /etc/apt/sources.list again and remove the line that you added after updating. This will return you to the normal update channel.
There will still be a few units that we will need to replace under warranty however.
Sam
Hi Sam,
So what do I have to do with my Vero 4K+ which is not working properly?
Did you try the improvements above?
In a few days we will contact the affected customers and make the appropriate arrangements
Thanks
Sam
Ran the commands as stated, it did a bunch of updates, asked for permission once for storage, agreed. Rebooted.
osmc@Kodibox:~$ iperf3 -c 192.168.1.10
Connecting to host 192.168.1.10, port 5201
[  4] local 192.168.1.141 port 33422 connected to 192.168.1.10 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   311 KBytes  2.55 Mbits/sec   16   4.28 KBytes
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.43 KBytes  11.7 Kbits/sec    1   4.28 KBytes
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    0   4.28 KBytes
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.43 KBytes  11.7 Kbits/sec    1   2.85 KBytes
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    0   2.85 KBytes
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    0   2.85 KBytes
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  22.8 KBytes   187 Kbits/sec   10   2.85 KBytes
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  78.4 KBytes   643 Kbits/sec   10   4.28 KBytes
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec   145 KBytes  1.19 Mbits/sec   21   2.85 KBytes
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    2   1.43 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   560 KBytes   459 Kbits/sec   61             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   472 KBytes   387 Kbits/sec                  receiver
            Should I try this as well, Sam?
I wasn’t getting horrible speeds on my new Vero 4K+ (and hadn’t really noticed any issues), but when I tested it was sitting at around 600 mbits/sec (which seemed low). I ran the update and now I’m seeing 830 mbits/sec. So not 900, but certainly a noticeable improvement to a device that already appeared to be working fine for me. Thanks for all your work on this.
I decided to have a go at installing the test build, and the issue is definitely not resolved, no. If anything it’s got worse. New iperf3 numbers:
Connecting to host 192.168.1.13, port 5201
[  4] local 192.168.1.209 port 48503 connected to 192.168.1.13 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  4.69 MBytes  39.3 Mbits/sec   26   8.55 KBytes
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.47 MBytes  12.4 Mbits/sec   23   5.70 KBytes
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.91 MBytes  16.0 Mbits/sec   25   5.70 KBytes
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec   163 KBytes  1.33 Mbits/sec    4   7.13 KBytes
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  2.84 MBytes  23.8 Mbits/sec   42   5.70 KBytes
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.38 MBytes  11.6 Mbits/sec   10   8.55 KBytes
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec   622 KBytes  5.09 Mbits/sec   18   5.70 KBytes
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec   171 KBytes  1.40 Mbits/sec    7   2.85 KBytes
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec   567 KBytes  4.65 Mbits/sec    6   7.13 KBytes
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.93 MBytes  16.2 Mbits/sec   24   7.13 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  15.7 MBytes  13.2 Mbits/sec  185             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  14.9 MBytes  12.5 Mbits/sec                  receiver
iperf Done.
One odd thing I noticed: the above numbers are generated with a Windows PC running the iperf3 server, and the Vero 4K+ running the iperf client; but if I do it the other way round (iperf3 server on the 4K+ and the client on the PC) then I get virtually full gigabit speed. I don’t know if that suggests anything.